Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, mechanical and tribological properties of carbon fiber/epoxy (CF/epoxy), glass fiber/epoxy (GF/epoxy) and hybrid carbon-glass fiber/epoxy (CGF/epoxy) composites with two laminate orientations (90/45/90/135/90) and (0/135/0/45/0) are investigated. Different loads (20–50 N) and frequencies (5–11 Hz) were used in tensile, flexural, interlaminar shear, density, microhardness and reciprocating sliding tests. The (90/45/90/135/90) architecture showed the best tensile properties with tensile strength of 637.55 MPa and Young’s modulus of 23.21 GPa for CF/epoxy, while the (0/135/0/45/0) architecture showed the best flexural properties with flexural strength of about 950 MPa for GF/epoxy. The COF and wear of CF/epoxy were lowest, and the wear of GF/epoxy was highest, compared to CF/epoxy, GF/epoxy showed 34.3% higher wear loss, and 16.2% higher specific wear rate for the (90/45/90/135/90) architecture. The (0/135/0/45/0) architecture resulted in the lowest wear loss and specific wear rate for all the composite systems, and CF/epoxy exhibited the best wear resistance. The measured void contents of CF, GF, and CGF composites were 13.27%, 15.47%, and 14.34%, respectively. Damage to the matrix, fiber fragmentation, and wear debris were observed on the worn surfaces using SEM analysis. An ANN model was used to predict COF with R 2 values of 0.91759 and 0.87056 for validation and testing respectively. In general, the results show that the type of reinforcement and laminate architecture have a significant influence on the mechanical, frictional and wear properties of the composite materials studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: