Investigates mechanical and tribological performance of fiber-reinforced polymers, indicating material selection impacts application suitability.
Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) matrix composites occupy a central position in contemporary aerospace, automotive, marine, and sports equipment manufacturing owing to their superior specific strength, specific stiffness, and tailorability of properties. The present study undertakes a systematic experimental investigation of the mechanical and tribological performance of three classes of woven FRP composites — E-Glass/Epoxy (GFRP), Carbon/Epoxy (CFRP), and Kevlar-29/Epoxy (KFRP) — fabricated by vacuum-assisted resin transfer moulding (VARTM) at fiber volume fractions (Vf) of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, and 2.5%. Mechanical characterisation encompasses ultimate tensile strength (UTS), flexural modulus, Charpy impact energy, and fracture toughness (K₁ᴄ). Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) provides storage modulus and glass transition temperature (Tg) data across 30–200°C. Tribological evaluation under pin-on-disc sliding wear at loads of 10–50 N and sliding velocities of 1–3 m/s quantifies specific wear rate and coefficient of friction. Results reveal that CFRP at 2.0% Vf achieves the highest UTS (521 MPa, 63% above neat resin) and flexural modulus (58 GPa), while KFRP at 2.5% Vf delivers the highest impact energy (10.7 J) and fracture toughness (1.50 MPa·m°·⁵). DMA confirms that CFRP maintains the highest storage modulus above Tg, whereas GFRP exhibits the lowest specific wear rate under high-load sliding (0.125 × 10⁻³ mm³/N·m at 50 N). The experimental data are correlated with SEM fractographic analysis to elucidate failure mechanisms including fiber pull-out, matrix cracking, and delamination. A multi-criteria decision matrix is employed to rank the three composite systems for aerospace interior, automotive structural panel, and sporting goods applications
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Priya Nair Sanjay Mehta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: