Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X-ray computed tomography (CT) is widely used for dimensional inspection of inaccessible internal geometry, but multi-modal public benchmark datasets with reference metrology remain scarce, particularly for internal cavities. This paper releases a CT--coordinate measuring machine (CMM) benchmark for wall-thickness measurements using CT surface extraction of an artefact with a complex internal cavity that is disassembled for tactile probing. Four cases span Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 625 in rough and chemically milled states. Each case includes nominal computer-aided design (CAD) geometry aligned to the CT reconstruction, CT projections, reconstructed volumes, CT surface segmentations, CMM point clouds with predefined thickness-pair vectors, and derived surface- and thickness-deviation labels. The paper defines the benchmark tasks and reporting convention and reports baseline results for reconstruction-based and CAD-informed routes. The benchmark permits validation of CT-based dimensional metrology in noisy and clean environments, including CAD-constrained surface reconstruction approaches that work entirely in projection space, such as elastic registration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paccoud et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: