Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Completed write-up of the author's draft "Frohman's Triple Regularization Framework" (Google Drive file main (3).tex, last modified 2 May 2026, 7:28 PM US Central). It states the Frohmanian Symplectic Tether, Metriplectic Regularization and Holographic Dual Regularization ideas as named hypotheses and conjectures. Proved here: a Riccati comparison lemma, a conditional regularity corollary obtained through Beale–Kato–Majda, and a divergence identity that corrects the draft's extended Clebsch representation. This does not resolve the Navier–Stokes existence and smoothness problem. Related records: 10.5281/zenodo.23904623, 23906579, 23930085, 23629499, 21856430. The untouched original draft of 2 May 2026 is preserved as its own record: 10.5281/zenodo.23964320. The files triple_regularization_v2.pdf/.tex are the current text and cite it. The files triple_regularization.pdf/.tex are the first staged copy, identical except that they lack this citation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Frohman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: