Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, this study examines the resource-based process linking health-specific leadership to healthcare employees’ well-being. Specifically, we examine vitality as an energy-based personal resource that may link health-specific leadership to job satisfaction and life satisfaction. By considering these outcomes simultaneously, we examine the relevance of health-specific leadership to employee well-being across work and broader life domains. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave, time-lagged survey design was used to collect data from 280 registered nurses at a large medical center in Taiwan. The hypothesized relationships were tested using structural equation modeling. Findings Health-specific leadership was positively associated with employee vitality, which, in turn, was positively associated with both job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Health-specific leadership was indirectly associated with both job satisfaction and life satisfaction through vitality. Originality/value This study extends health-specific leadership research by examining employee well-being across both work and broader life domains and by identifying vitality as a personal energy resource linking health-specific leadership to these outcomes. In doing so, it integrates the breadth of well-being outcomes with an energy-based mechanism to explain how health-specific leadership may be associated with employee well-being within and beyond the workplace.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsieh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: