Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supplier performance directly affects manufacturing continuity, cost and delivery commitments, yet conventional scorecards are retrospective and may hide gradual deterioration. This paper presents a temporal supplier risk prediction and prioritization framework that uses Month N operational behaviour to estimate a supplier’s Low, Medium or High risk category in Month N+1. The workflow covers supplier-month aggregation, 47 temporal features (lags, rolling statistics, trend and deterioration indicators, risk history and business exposure), engineered target labels, chronological validation and a ninemonth out-of-time (OOT) test. Five classifiers are compared with a persistence baseline on 1,450 supplier-month observations spanning 39 months. HistGradientBoosting achieves the best overall OOT result (54.32% accuracy, 48.93% Macro-F1, 0.7039 ROC-AUC), while Extra Trees reaches 85.51% high-risk recall, showing a trade-off between overall performance and high-risk screening. Predictions are combined with delivery, quality, exposure and deterioration signals into a transparent priority score and rule-based intervention recommendations delivered through a Power BI dashboard. Because the labels are engineered rather than independently observed, the system is positioned as an early-warning aid for human review
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: