Key result
Multimodal imaging and risk scores refine patient selection and identify futile transcatheter tricuspid repair.
Why the study?
Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, creating a need for echocardiographic assessment beyond conventional severity grading to determine prognostic value and clinical applicability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advanced echocardiographic parameters and risk scores (such as the five-grade TR classification, RV-PA coupling, GLIDE score, and TRI-SCORE) improve risk stratification and patient selection for transcatheter tricuspid regurgitation interventions.
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for echocardiographic assessment beyond conventional severity grading. This narrative review examines the prognostic value and clinical applicability of established and emerging echocardiographic parameters. TR phenotype influences prognosis and response to transcatheter intervention, with more favourable outcomes in atrial than ventricular functional TR. The five-grade TR classification improves risk stratification, with massive or torrential TR associated with worse outcomes despite comparable procedural success. Right ventricular–pulmonary arterial coupling provides valuable prognostic information and may help identify an optimal therapeutic window for transcatheter intervention, particularly in patients with intermediate coupling values. The GLIDE score helps predict anatomical suitability and procedural success for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair, whereas high TRI-SCORE values (≥6) identify patients in whom a significant survival benefit from repair has not been demonstrated. Treatment decisions should therefore integrate symptoms, overall clinical status, procedural feasibility, and expected benefit through individualized Heart Team assessment. Following intervention, the severity of residual TR, ideally mild or less, remains a key determinant of procedural success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rocca et al. (2026) conducted a review in Tricuspid regurgitation. Echocardiographic prognostic parameters and risk scores (five-grade TR classification, RV-PA coupling, GLIDE score, TRI-SCORE) vs. Conventional tricuspid regurgitation severity grading was evaluated on Prognosis and procedural success in tricuspid regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: