Why the study?
Intervention for tricuspid regurgitation is often delayed due to limited understanding of anatomy and pathophysiology, underestimation of severity by standard imaging, and the need to determine appropriate management amid rapid transcatheter developments.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May inform transcatheter tricuspid strategies; extends synthesis of advances but leaves randomized evidence gaps.
Heightened interest in tricuspid regurgitation (TR) stems from the consistent association of mortality with greater severity of TR, and a low use of surgical solutions in the setting of high in-hospital mortality attributed to the late presentation of the disease. The delay in intervention is likely related to a limited understanding of the valvular/ventricular anatomy and disease pathophysiology, along with an underestimation of TR severity by standard imaging modalities. With the rapid development of transcatheter solutions which have shown early safety and efficacy, there is a growing need to understand and accurately diagnose the valvular disease process in order to determine appropriate management solutions. The current review will describe both normal and pathologic tricuspid valvular anatomy, the classification of these anatomic substrates of TR, the strengths and limitations of the current guidelines-recommended multi-parametric echocardiographic approach and the role of multi-modality imaging, as well as the role of transcatheter device therapy in the management of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hahn et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: