Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explains the AKP’s reversal from pro-Western conservative democracy to anti-Western Islamist civilizationalism not as identity resurfacing or ideational conversion, but as a power strategy rooted in political economy. The AKP’s dependent, credit-driven growth model was structurally vulnerable; sustaining it required a new, more personalized and discretionary neoliberalism, for which civilizationalism supplied the ideological cover, recasting coercive redistribution as national restoration. Domestically, it denied citizens’ rights-bearing status; internationally, it produced a transactional, inconsistent foreign policy, culminating not in elevated standing but in confirming the lesser state status Turkish modernizers have sought to escape since the late Ottoman period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menderes Çınar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: