Key result
CMR alters diagnosis and treatment in ~77% of suspected ACS patients with normal coronaries.
Why the study?
Acute chest pain, ST-changes on EKG, and elevated cardiac troponin without obstructive coronary artery disease present a diagnostic challenge. This study evaluated the usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the emergency room to diagnose conditions otherwise considered ACS in patients with normal coronary arteries.
Observational (n=47)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR may identify non-ACS diagnoses in troponin-positive chest pain with normal coronaries; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials before routine adoption.
Acute chest pain, ST-changes on EKG and elevation of cardiac troponin in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease represent a clinical challenge. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to diagnose causes other than obstructive coronary artery disease.The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of CMRto diagnoseconditions in the emergency room that otherwise would be consideredas acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with normal coronary arteries. Forty-seven patients with chest pain and/or electrocardiographic changes and elevated troponin concentration occurring in the absence of significant coronary artery stenosis (normal or stenosis < 50% of the vessel diameter on angiography, computed tomography or both) were selected and prospectively submitted to CMR exam in a 1.5T Philips scanner between May 2013 and June 2014. Ventricular function by cine MR with SSFP technique, and myocardial tissue characterization using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were evaluated in patients referred to the Emergency room. LGE patterns were analyzed visually by 2 observers and classified as ischemic (involving subendocardial layer) and non-ischemic (multifocal, not involving subendocardial layer, non coronary distribution). Among 47 patients, all with interpretableCMR exams, diagnosis of acute myocarditis was found in 21 patients (45%), acute myocardial infarction in 9 patients (19%) and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in 4 patients (9%). Other final diagnoses were hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (7%), coronary embolism (4%), cardiomyopathy (4%), sepsis (2%), aortic stenosis (2%) and noncompaction myocardium (2%). In 34 patients (72%), CMR changed theinitial ACS diagnosis to another final diagnosis. Additionally,2 patients (5%) primarily considered as having myocarditis received a final diagnosis of myocardial infarction. In the study, 77% of patients had theirprimary diagnosis and treatment changed after CMR study. The presence, distribution and pattern of late gadolinium enhancement by CMR were crucial in establishing a precise final diagnosis and appropriately changing patient management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakamura et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Suspected acute coronary syndrome with normal coronary arteries (n=47). Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Change in primary diagnosis and treatment after CMR study. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance changed the primary diagnosis and treatment in 77% of emergency room patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome and normal coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: