Key result
Niacin therapy reduces composite CVD events by ~34% compared to control.
Why the study?
Previously available randomized trial data on the clinical efficacy of niacin were challenged by the AIM-HIGH trial, which showed no reduction in CVD events with niacin added to intensive simvastatin therapy. This study assessed the aggregate clinical trial evidence for niacin in reducing CVD events.
Does niacin, alone or combined with other lipid-altering therapy, reduce cardiovascular disease events in clinical trial subjects?
Meta-Analysis (n=9,959)
Does niacin, alone or combined with other lipid-altering therapy, reduce cardiovascular disease events in clinical trial subjects?
This meta-analysis of 11 trials indicates that niacin significantly reduces composite cardiovascular disease and major coronary heart disease events, potentially via a mechanism independent of HDL-C changes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Niacin associated with fewer CVD events in meta-analysis; supports consensus but leaves open role after AIM-HIGH.
Objectives This study sought to assess the efficacy of niacin for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, as indicated by the aggregate body of clinical trial evidence including data from the recently published AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health Outcomes) trial. Background Previously available randomized clinical trial data assessing the clinical efficacy of niacin has been challenged by results from AIM-HIGH, which failed to demonstrate a reduction in CVD event incidence in patients with established CVD treated with niacin as an adjunct to intensive simvastatin therapy. Methods Clinical trials of niacin, alone or combined with other lipid-altering therapy, were identified via MEDLINE. Odds ratios (ORs) for CVD endpoints were calculated with a random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression modeled the relationship of differences in on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the magnitude of effect of niacin on CVD events. Results Eleven eligible trials including 9,959 subjects were identified. Niacin use was associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoints of any CVD event (OR: 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.89; p = 0.007) and major coronary heart disease event (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). No significant association was observed between niacin therapy and stroke incidence (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.54; p = 0.65). The magnitude of on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol difference between treatment arms was not significantly associated with the magnitude of the effect of niacin on outcomes. Conclusions The consensus perspective derived from available clinical data supports that niacin reduces CVD events and, further, that this may occur through a mechanism not reflected by changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavigne et al. (2012) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular disease prevention (n=9,959). Niacin vs. Control or non-niacin lipid-altering therapy was evaluated on Composite of any cardiovascular disease (CVD) event (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89, p=0.007). Niacin therapy significantly reduced the composite of any CVD event (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.89; p=0.007) and major coronary heart disease events (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.96; p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: