Key result
Niacin therapy cuts coronary revascularization ~69% and lowers nonfatal MI versus placebo.
Why the study?
Previous trials on niacin therapy in patients with prior coronary artery disease have shown inconsistent results regarding cardiovascular outcomes.
Does niacin therapy reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=5,137)
Does niacin therapy reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease?
Relative Risk: 0.307 (95% CI 0.15–0.628)
p-value: p=.001
In a meta-analysis of 7 trials, niacin therapy significantly reduced coronary revascularization, nonfatal MI, and stroke/TIA in patients with coronary artery disease.
May warrant re-evaluation of niacin in secondary prevention; challenges current guidelines de-emphasizing its role.
BACKGROUND: Niacin or nicotinic acid (vitamin B3) raises the levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) by about 30% to 35%. In patients with prior coronary disease, 7 trials have been published on clinical cardiovascular disease outcomes and the results, not surprisingly, are inconsistent. Hence, we performed this meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of niacin on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: A systematic search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases was performed. Seven studies with a total of 5137 patients met our inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity of the studies was analyzed by the Cochran Q statistics. The significance of common treatment effect was assessed by computing the combined relative risks using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. A 2-sided alpha error of less than .05 was considered statistically significant (P < .05). RESULTS: Compared to placebo group, niacin therapy significantly reduced coronary artery revascularization (RR [relative risk]: 0.307 with 95% CI: 0.150-0.628; P = .001), nonfatal myocardial infarction ([MI]; RR: 0.719; 95% CI: 0.603-0.856; P = .000), stroke, and TIA ([transient ischemic attack] RR: 0.759; 95%CI: 0.613-0.940; P = .012), as well as a possible but nonsignificant decrease in cardiac mortality (RR: 0.883: 95% CI: 0.773-1.008; p= 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of seven trials of secondary prevention, niacin was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events and possible small but non-significant decreases in coronary and cardiovascular mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duggal et al. (2010) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease (n=5,137). Niacin therapy vs. Placebo was evaluated on Coronary artery revascularization (RR 0.307, 95% CI 0.150-0.628, p=.001). Niacin therapy significantly reduced coronary artery revascularization (RR 0.307; 95% CI 0.150-0.628; P=0.001) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.719; 95% CI 0.603-0.856; P<0.001) compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: