Key result
Off-pump CABG was associated with lower inotropic support requirement >24h (10.0% vs 76.7%; p<0.00001), shorter operative time (254 vs 334.5 min; p<0.001), and lower CK-MB/cTnI levels than on-pump.
Why the study?
Off-pump and on-pump CABG techniques differ in intraoperative management and postoperative outcomes, motivating a comparison of operative and postoperative parameters between the two approaches.
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce operative time, perioperative myocardial injury, and postoperative complications compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
No
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduce operative time, perioperative myocardial injury, and postoperative complications compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients undergoing CABG for multivessel disease, off-pump CABG is associated with shorter operative duration, lower perioperative myocardial injury biomarker release, and significantly less need for prolonged postoperative inotropic support compared to on-pump CABG, with similar early clinical complication rates.
Background: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the standard surgical treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease.Off-pump and on-pump techniques differ in intraoperative management and postoperative outcomes.This study aimed to compare operative and postoperative parameters between off-pump and on-pump CABG patients.Methods: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted in a cardiac surgery department.A total of 60 patients undergoing CABG were divided into two groups: off-pump CABG (n=30) and on-pump CABG (n=30).Baseline characteristics, operative variables, postoperative clinical outcomes and myocardial injury markers including CK-MB and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) were analyzed.Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests, with p≤0.05 considered significant.Results: Baseline demographic characteristics, risk factors and preoperative cardiac function were comparable between groups.Operative time was significantly shorter in the off-pump group compared to the on-pump group (254.00 ± 28.75 vs. 334.50± 23.72 minutes; p<0.001).Postoperative inotropic support requirement was significantly higher in the on-pump group (76.7% vs. 10.0%;p<0.00001).CK-MB and cTnI levels were significantly elevated in the on-pump group at 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively, indicating greater myocardial injury.However, mechanical ventilation time, blood loss, transfusion requirement and postoperative complications showed no significant differences between groups.Conclusion: Both on-pump and off-pump CABG are safe and effective techniques with comparable early clinical outcomes.Off-pump CABG is associated with shorter operative time and reduced perioperative myocardial injury, while on-pump CABG requires greater postoperative inotropic support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study conducted a cross-sectional in Multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n=60). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) vs. On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was evaluated on Postoperative inotrope support requirement > 24 hours (p=<0.00001). Off-pump CABG was associated with lower inotropic support requirement >24h (10.0% vs 76.7%; p<0.00001), shorter operative time (254 vs 334.5 min; p<0.001), and lower CK-MB/cTnI levels than on-pump.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: