Key result
ECPR for refractory OHCA achieves ~16% survival to discharge, with favorable long-term survival among survivors.
Why the study?
Survivors of OHCA face risks of long-term neurological, cognitive, and psychological impairment that may extend to their caregivers, prompting an evaluation of long-term survival and multidimensional outcomes in ECPR-treated refractory OHCA survivors and their caregivers.
Cohort (n=406)
No
Long-term survival after ECPR for refractory OHCA is largely confined to patients discharged with favourable neurological status, though survivors frequently experience mild cognitive impairment and poor sleep, and caregivers commonly experience anxiety, supporting structured follow-up programmes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide prognosis discussions for ECPR discharge survivors; leaves open validation in larger prospective cohorts.
Introduction Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are at risk of long-term neurological, cognitive, and psychological impairment, and this burden may extend to their caregivers. We evaluated long-term survival and multidimensional outcomes in survivors of refractory OHCA treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and in their caregivers. Methods Adults discharged alive after ECPR for refractory OHCA at a tertiary centre (2013-2024) were included. Survivors underwent long-term assessment of functional status and cognition, and self-reported psychological well-being, sleep, fatigue, return to work, and quality of life (QoL). One caregiver per survivor was evaluated for psychological distress, QoL, fatigue, and perceived burden. Results Among 406 ECPR-treated patients, 63 (16%) were discharged alive. At a median follow-up of 3.1 (IQR 0.6–6.9) years, 38/62 (61%) were alive, of whom 31 (82%) had favourable neurological outcome. Only 7 of all 406 treated patients (1.7%) were alive with poor neurological outcome. Five-year mortality was higher in patients discharged with poor versus favourable neurological status (86% vs. 13%, p<0.001). Among the 17 survivors and 19 caregivers assessed, QoL was preserved and comparable between groups (EQ VAS 70 [60–80] vs 80 [75–90]). Most survivors and caregivers reported no limitations in mobility, self-care, or usual activities. Mild cognitive impairment was found in 6/16 survivors and poor sleep quality in 10/17. Anxiety symptoms were more frequent among caregivers than survivors (6/18 vs 1/17). No participant met criteria for symptomatic post-traumatic stress disorder. Seven of 15 previously employed survivors and all caregivers returned to work. Conclusions Long-term survival after ECPR was largely confined to patients with favourable neurological recovery. Despite preserved overall QoL, survivors frequently showed cognitive impairment and reported sleep disturbances. Anxiety symptoms were common among caregivers. These findings support structured long-term follow-up programmes for both survivors and their families.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gazzato et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) (n=406). Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and discharge neurological status was evaluated on Long-term survival and multidimensional outcomes (neurological status, functional status, cognition, psychological well-being, sleep, fatigue, return to work, and quality of life) (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: