Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Cardiac arrest remains a critical condition with high mortality and catastrophic neurological impact. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been introduced as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation modalities. However, survival with good neurological outcomes remains a major concern. This study aims to explore our early experience with ECPR and identify the factors associated with survival in patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing 6-year data from a tertiary center, the country reference for ECPR. This study was conducted at a national center of ECPR. Participants of this study were adult patients who experienced witnessed refractory cardiopulmonary arrest and were supported by ECPR. ECPR was performed for eligible patients as per the local service protocols. Results: Data from 87 patients were analyzed; of this cohort, 62/87 patients presented with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and 25/87 presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Overall survival to decannulation and hospital discharge rates were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively. Among survivors (n = 22), 19 presented with IHCA (30.6%), while only 3 survivors presented with OHCA (12%). A total of 15/87 (17%) patients were alive at 6-month follow-up. All survivors had good neurological function assessed as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Multivariate logistic regression to predict survival to hospital discharge showed that IHCA was the only independent predictor (odds ratio: 5.8, P = 0.042); however, this positive association disappeared after adjusting for the first left ventricular ejection fraction after resuscitation. Conclusions: In this study, the use of ECPR for IHCA was associated with a higher survival to discharge compared to OHCA. This study demonstrated a comparable survival rate to other established centers, particularly for IHCA. Neurological outcomes were comparable in both IHCA and OHCA survivors. However, large multicenter studies are warranted for better understanding and improving the outcomes.
Labib et al. (Tue,) studied this question.