Key result
Distal anastomosis new entry after ATAAD repair linked to ~6.3-fold higher 10-year distal reoperation risk.
Why the study?
Does distal anastomosis new entry (DANE) increase the risk of distal aortic reoperation in patients undergoing hemiarch or partial arch repair for DeBakey I acute type A aortic dissection?
Cohort (n=139)
Does distal anastomosis new entry (DANE) increase the risk of distal aortic reoperation in patients undergoing hemiarch or partial arch repair for DeBakey I acute type A aortic dissection?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Distal anastomosis new entry occurs in 15.1% of patients after hemiarch or partial arch repair for DeBakey I ATAAD and independently increases the long-term hazard of distal aortic reoperation over sixfold, with risk graded by tear diameter.
Objective: Distal anastomosis new entry (DANE) is an intimal tear at the distal suture line arising during repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) that may sustain false lumen perfusion and drive adverse remodeling. We assessed its incidence, predictors, and long-term consequences after hemiarch or partial arch repair. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 139 consecutive patients with DeBakey I ATAAD treated from 2005 to 2021 who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 months postoperatively. DANE was defined as any interluminal communication within 2 cm of the distal anastomosis. The primary endpoint was distal aortic reoperation. The cumulative incidence was estimated with Fine–Gray competing risk methods and predictors of DANE with Firth’s penalized logistic regression. Results: DANE was identified in 21 patients (15.1%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of distal reoperation was 32.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12% to 56%) with DANE versus 4.0% (95% CI: 1% to 10%) without (Gray’s test, P < 0.001). In multivariable Fine–Gray analysis, DANE (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 6.26, 95% CI: 1.95 to 20.1, P = 0.002) and preoperative descending aortic reentry (SHR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.12 to 15.5, P = 0.033) independently predicted distal reoperation; each 1 mm increase in DANE diameter raised the subdistribution hazard by 7% (SHR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.12, P < 0.001). An arch entry tear predicted DANE formation in univariable logistic regression (odds ratio = 3.57, 95% CI: 1.18 to 10.9, P = 0.025). A Firth’s penalized 3-predictor model (arch entry tear, experienced aortic surgeon, descending reentry) yielded a 0.704 optimism-corrected area under the curve. Conclusions: DANE substantially increased the long-term risk of distal aortic reoperation after ATAAD repair, with risk graded by tear diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mustonen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in DeBakey I acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=139). Distal anastomosis new entry (DANE) vs. No distal anastomosis new entry (DANE) was evaluated on Distal aortic reoperation (SHR 6.26, 95% CI 1.95-20.1, p=0.002). Distal anastomosis new entry after ATAAD repair increased 10-year distal reoperation risk vs no DANE (32.4% vs 4.0%; SHR 6.26, 95% CI 1.95-20.1, P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: