Key result
In situ laser fenestration of the LSA for TEVAR achieves ~98% technical success.
Why the study?
The outcomes after in situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery (LSA) for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) needed systematic evaluation.
Does in situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery provide high technical success and favorable early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair?
Meta-Analysis (n=562)
Does in situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery provide high technical success and favorable early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery during TEVAR demonstrates high technical success (98.1%) and low 30-day mortality (2.1%), though evidence certainty remains low to very low.
Objective To evaluate the outcomes after in situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery (LSA) for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261457148). Data sources were the Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE. All studies reporting the outcomes of in situ laser fenestration of the LSA for TEVAR were eligible for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was conducted. Results Five studies encompassing 562 patients were included. The primary indication was type B aortic dissection (85%). The pooled technical success rate was 98.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.6–99.2%). The pooled 30-day mortality was 2.1% (95% CI, 1.0–5.9%). The pooled incidence of target-vessel instability was 1.9% (95% CI, 0.3–4.5%), and the overall reintervention rate was 2.7% (95% CI, 0.4–6.4%). GRADE certainty was low to very low across outcomes. Conclusion LSA in situ laser fenestration demonstrates high technical success and favorable early clinical outcomes. Comparative trials against alternative endovascular strategies are required to establish its long-term durability and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esposito et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Thoracic aortic pathology requiring TEVAR (85% type B aortic dissection) (n=562). In situ laser fenestration of the left subclavian artery for TEVAR was evaluated on Technical success (95% CI 96.6-99.2). In situ laser fenestration of the LSA for TEVAR achieved a pooled technical success rate of 98.1% (95% CI, 96.6–99.2%) and 30-day mortality of 2.1% (95% CI, 1.0–5.9%).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: