Key result
Moderate carotid stenosis progresses faster than severe stenosis by ~1.4 cm/s per day while awaiting CEA.
Why the study?
Whether the rate of hemodynamic change after a symptomatic carotid event differs between moderate and severe stenosis during the waiting period before endarterectomy was uncertain.
Does the rate of hemodynamic change (ICA PSV) after a symptomatic carotid event differ between moderate and severe baseline carotid stenosis in patients awaiting carotid endarterectomy?
Cohort
Does the rate of hemodynamic change (ICA PSV) after a symptomatic carotid event differ between moderate and severe baseline carotid stenosis in patients awaiting carotid endarterectomy?
During the waiting period before carotid endarterectomy, moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis shows progressive velocity acceleration whereas severe stenosis plateaus in ICA PSV with a drop in distal CCA PSV, suggesting ICA and CCA velocities should be interpreted separately over time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support closer PSV monitoring in moderate symptomatic stenosis; leaves open whether trends predict events or alter CEA timing.
Objective To determine whether the rate of hemodynamic change after a symptomatic carotid event differs between moderate and severe stenosis. Methods Serial duplex examinations in symptomatic patients awaiting carotid endarterectomy were analyzed with a linear mixed-effects model, using an extended, prospectively maintained database. Maximum internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA PSV) was modeled as a linear function of time from the index event interacting with baseline severity (moderate 125-229, severe ≥230 cm/s), with a random intercept per patient. The rate of change (cm/s per day) and the moderate-severe difference were the principal outcomes. Categorical interval comparisons and paired within-patient changes, including distal common carotid artery (CCA) PSV, were secondary analyses. Results The time course of maximum ICA PSV differed by baseline severity (interaction p = .006). The modeled rate of change was +1.20 cm/s per day (95% CI 0.28 to 2.12) in moderate and -0.21 cm/s per day (95% CI -0.58 to 0.17) in severe stenosis (difference 1.41 cm/s per day, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.40; p = .005). Secondary analyses were consistent: moderate stenosis accelerated with stable inflow, whereas severe stenosis showed no further ICA acceleration but a fall in distal CCA PSV (-3.0 cm/s; p < .001). Conclusion The rate of hemodynamic change during the waiting period depends on baseline severity: moderate stenosis accelerates, whereas severe stenosis shows little further ICA acceleration, consistent with behavior near a velocity ceiling. Maximum ICA PSV and distal CCA PSV are best read as separate, time-sensitive variables rather than as a single ratio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bodegom et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic carotid stenosis. Moderate baseline carotid stenosis (ICA PSV 125-229 cm/s) vs. Severe baseline carotid stenosis (ICA PSV ≥230 cm/s) was evaluated on Rate of change in maximum internal carotid artery peak systolic velocity (ICA PSV) in cm/s per day and moderate-severe difference (MD 1.41 cm/s per day, 95% CI 0.42-2.40, p=0.005). Moderate carotid stenosis accelerated (+1.20 cm/s/day) vs severe stenosis (-0.21 cm/s/day) while awaiting endarterectomy (difference 1.41 cm/s/day; 95% CI 0.42-2.40; p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: