Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaching net-zero CO2 emissions in Europe by 2050 requires the strategic deployment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies. Among these, CO2 electrolysis (CO2E) stands out as a promising pre-commercial technology. Using captured CO2, for which compositions vary significantly depending on the CO2 source and capture method, poses a practical challenge for CO2E as feedstock impurity tolerances remain poorly understood. To bridge this gap, here we conducted a prospective techno-economic assessment of a CO2 purification process, removing major and trace impurities in raw CO2 from a bioethanol plant. This serves as a first step toward understanding the design and cost implications for future industrial-scale CO2E plants. Three main takeaways were found. Firstly, achieving the stringent CO2 purity requirements anticipated for CO2E (<ppb-level impurities) can result in total CO2 costs exceeding 200 EUR/tonne of purified CO2, an order of magnitude higher CO2 prices assumed in existing CO2E techno-economic studies. Secondly, due to economies of scale, at 1 Mtonne/year, the levelized cost of purified CO2 falls below the projected direct air capture (DAC) costs for 2050, but it approaches the limits related to CO2 electrolyzer scale-up and biogenic CO2 availability in Europe. Thirdly, cryogenic distillation for the removal of non-condensable gases dominates the variable operating expenditures. Future research is needed for improved understanding of impurity tolerance in CO2 electrolyzers to enable potentially simplified CO2 purification trains and reduce costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: