Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fourier analysis has become a crucial tool for understanding the expressivity of Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) models, as well as an important indicator of barren plateaus (BP). While existing literature has only studied angle-embedded VQCs in a noiseless environment, here we develop the Fourier analysis of VQCs with non-linear data embedding, with particular focus on amplitude embedding, which provides a naturally compact encoding scheme. We first investigate a subtle difference in the domain of input features within amplitude embedding that leads to a distinct expressivity of the zero-frequency Fourier coefficient. Assuming that the ensemble of unitaries generated from the parameter space forms at least a unitary 2-design, we derive that, in integer-valued frequencies, the mean of the Fourier coefficients is concentrated at zero, and the variance is upper bounded by an inverse power-law function with respect to the infinity norm of the multi-dimensional frequency. A numerical evidence of exponentially decaying pattern with respect to the frequency magnitude is also established, providing a frequency-perspective of viewing VQC model expressivity and its trainability. When a noise channel with unitary Kraus operators and probabilities p k is taken into account, the variance is further suppressed by a factor (∑ k p k 2 ) Q < 1, where Q is the number of channel instances applied. Furthermore, we demonstrate and validate the analytical results through simulations, both noiseless and noisy, and contrast its expressivity against the angle-embedded model Fourier features. We also examine the model's performance where target functions are decomposed into non-integer frequencies, highlighting the practical utility of the approach. Our results establish a rigorous Fourier framework for amplitude-encoded VQCs, offering both theoretical guarantees on expressivity, hence trainability scaling in the frequency domain, as well as practical simulations for deployment on noisy quantum devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: