Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patient: Male, 61-year-old Final Diagnosis: Maxillary partial edentulism with chronic periodontitis Symptoms: Missing maxillary left posterior teeth • reduced masticatory efficiency • mobility of the maxillary right anterior teeth • poor retention of the previous removable partial denture Clinical Procedure: Tooth extraction, dental implant placement, and rehabilitation with an implant-crown-retained removable partial denture Specialty: Dentistry Background:This report describes an incremental design refinement of the implant-crown-retained removable partial denture (ICRPD) for maxillary edentulous rehabilitation, comprising a non-cross-arch configuration with segmented short-span splinted crowns and occlusal-rest-free ring clasps. Case Report:A 61-year-old man presented with maxillary edentulism and dissatisfaction with his previous removable partial denture, which he had worn for 2 years with progressively deteriorating retention.Clinical and radiographic examinations revealed partial edentulism and chronic periodontitis.After initial periodontal therapy, teeth #13, #14, and #23 were extracted; implants were placed at sites #13, #14, #23, and #24.Following osseointegration, an ICRPD was fabricated using short-span splinted implant crowns and pure titanium ring clasps without occlusal rests.The prosthesis provided retention through implant crowns with combined implant-mucosal support.At the 4-year follow-up, probing depths were 1 to 3 mm without bleeding on probing.The patient reported high satisfaction; the OHIP-EDENT score (Chinese version) decreased from 5 to 2, and the visual analog scale pain score decreased from 3 to 0. Radiographic assessment showed marginal bone loss of 0.16 to 1.67 mm.Cone-beam computed tomography confirmed stable marginal bone levels.No biological or mechanical complications were observed. Conclusions:This case demonstrates that the refined ICRPD design, incorporating occlusal-rest-free ring clasps and shortspan splinted crowns, provided reliable retention and long-term stability over 4 years, without mechanical complications and with high patient satisfaction.These findings support the clinical feasibility of this design, which may represent a promising option for appropriately selected patients; it is hypothesized to reduce the prosthetic span and limit unfavorable load transmission to the implant necks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: