Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination remains a major environmental concern because hydrophobic compounds have limited accessibility to microbial cells. This study hypothesized that Bacillus paramycoides SB1 could maintain growth under crude-oil exposure while exhibiting biosurfactant activity associated with altered oil–water interfacial properties and measurable biological hydrocarbon removal. SB1 maintained growth in mineral salt medium supplemented with up to 2% (v/v) crude oil, reaching a maximum OD₆₀₀ of 0.787 at 36 h. Its cell-free supernatant exhibited biosurfactant activity, with an oil displacement zone of 1.77 ± 0.05 cm, emulsification index of 57.50 ± 3.80% against n-hexane, surface tension of 37.9 mN m−1, and interfacial tension of 8.4 mN m−1 against crude oil. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis provided preliminary evidence of peptide-associated functional groups consistent with a lipopeptide-like biosurfactant. During 21 days of incubation, residual total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) decreased from 93.98 ± 1.72% to 77.56 ± 1.14%, corresponding to a 17.47% relative reduction, compared with 3.9% in the uninoculated control. GC–MS characterized the initial crude oil as a heterogeneous mixture containing aliphatic, aromatic, and halogenated compounds. Lattice Boltzmann simulations parameterized with the measured interfacial tension further showed that wettability influenced pore-scale phase redistribution and residual oil trapping. Overall, the findings integrate biosurfactant activity, biological hydrocarbon removal, and pore-scale fluid behavior into a multiscale framework for evaluating the hydrocarbon-removal potential of B. paramycoides SB1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Syamsuri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: