Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly capable of automating professional tasks traditionally performed by entry-level staff. While such automation may drive short-term efficiency and profitability, it risks disrupting the experience-based learning pipeline essential for developing a firm's long-term innovation capacity. This paper introduces the Knowledge Trap: a structural condition where immediate gains from AI adoption lead to the gradual degradation of the tacit knowledge and adaptive search capabilities required for future performance. Using an NK agent-based simulation model, the study examines how different sectors and governance horizons influence this risk. The model distinguishes between three adoption strategies - substitutive, hybrid, and complementary - to track their long-term effects on a firm's experience pool and innovation fitness. The findings demonstrate that the Knowledge Trap is most severe under substitutive adoption, particularly in sectors with high task interdependency. Conversely, adopting AI in a complementary mode can substantially mitigate these capability losses. This research contributes a forecasting framework to help organisations and policymakers identify structural risks and develop AI implementation strategies that protect the human talent pipeline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: