Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Population ageing is increasing demand for osteoporosis assessment, yet access to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains uneven. The Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) may help prioritize access. To evaluate OSTA ranking, referral workload, and age-specific detection, with separate hip-fracture follow-up in China. We analyzed women aged 50–79 years in US/Korean DXA surveys and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Survey-weighted analyses assessed femoral-neck osteoporosis using a common US T-score reference; 1,000 cluster bootstrap replicates quantified discrimination and referral uncertainty, including paired allocation contrasts. Community-cluster Cox and competing-risk models assessed self-reported hip fracture. External areas under the curve were 0.754–0.831. A US threshold targeting 20% referral selected 50.9% and 53.4% in Korea, or 48.7% and 49.4% after age standardization. Pooled target percentiles fixed referral at 20%, but sensitivity at ages 50–59 was 4.6% in both Korean periods. Age-specific allocation reduced overall sensitivity from 52.1% to 34.6% and 50.9% to 39.3%. CHARLS recorded 223 fractures during a median follow-up of 9 years; the highest-risk 20% captured 29.1% of events (adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.26–2.29). Controlling workload did not preserve age-specific detection. CHARLS had no DXA data; femoral-neck osteoporosis was not verified in Chinese women. Percentile allocation requires prospective evaluation rather than stand-alone clinical adoption. The CHARLS associations do not establish prognostic information independent of age and weight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: