Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Credential-based attendance mechanisms such as QR codes and RFID cards record who checked in but not whether that person is physically present, which makes them vulnerable to proxy attendance. Vision-based alternatives depend on line of sight and camera coverage, whereas Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) indoor positioning can passively verify the presence of a student’s device. However, received signal strength indicator (RSSI) measurements are highly sensitive to multipath propagation, so neighboring workstations with similar signal characteristics are difficult to distinguish. This study evaluates the feasibility of workstation-level BLE localization in a classroom with 40 workstations and four beacons. RSSI was smoothed with a Kalman filter and combined with relational features, namely beacon ranks and pairwise RSSI differences, as inputs to Weighted K-Nearest Neighbor (WKNN), Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers at 40, 20, 8, and 4 location classes. Kalman filtering improved accuracy for all four models at every granularity (+3.34 to +11.89 percentage points); for the two main models, WKNN and RF, all paired cluster-bootstrap 95% confidence intervals of this gain were above zero (+4.58 to +8.71 percentage points). The relational features improved tree-based ensembles at 40 classes (RF: +1.38 percentage points, 95% CI [+0.03, +2.88]; XGBoost: +1.35 percentage points, point estimate) but reduced WKNN accuracy at the finer granularities. RF reached 40.68% accuracy at 40 classes, 61.06% at 8 classes, and 73.37% at 4 classes, and all four classifiers performed similarly at 40 classes. These results show a clear trade-off between spatial resolution and classification reliability with four beacons; identity binding and session-level attendance decisions remain to be evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: