Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recycled steel fibers (RFs) recovered from end-of-life tires (ELTs) are a potential alternative to manufactured steel fibers in concrete, but their irregular geometry may limit their effectiveness. This study compared RF and commercial hooked-end steel fibers (CFs) in ordinary Portland cement concrete produced at water-to-cement ratios (w/c) of 0.40, 0.50, and 0.60 with fiber dosages of 15, 30, and 45 kg/m3. Workability, compressive strength, flexural strength, residual flexural strengths (fR1 and fR3), and toughness were determined, and a multi-response desirability approach combining compressive strength, fR3, and toughness was applied. Both fiber types improved the post-cracking response; however, CF provided higher residual strengths and toughness, whereas RF reduced workability more and showed a greater loss of residual capacity between fR1 and fR3. Compressive strength was governed mainly by w/c rather than fiber dosage. The highest overall desirability was obtained with 45 kg/m3 of CF and a w/c of 0.40, with a geometric mean (D) of 0.653, while for RF the maximum was obtained with 30 kg/m3 and w/c = 0.40 (D = 0.285). RF effectiveness depends on matrix quality and dosage, and RF should be selected according to the required post-cracking performance rather than as a direct replacement for CF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: