Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in agriculture. There is a substantial evidence of its adverse effects on the physiological functions in living organisms. In vivo studies indicate a correlation between organophosphate poisoning and blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level. It is hypothesized that C60 fullerene, acting as potent ROS scavenger, can modulate the progression of this pathological process. Objective: To evaluate the level of CPK activity in serum under rat chronic glyphosate poisoning using C60 fullerene as a potential protective nanoagent. Methods: C60 fullerene aqueous solution (C60FAS) was obtained by C60 transfer from toluene into water under ultrasonic treatment. Male Wister rats were devided in four groups (n = 10 in each). Glyphosate was administered orally on a daily basis for 120 days. The 1st and 2nd groups received herbicide at a doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg respectively, the 3rd and 4th groups received oral administration of C60FAS at a dose of 1 mg/kg daily immediately after herbicide exposure. The activity of CPK in blood serum was measured every 10 days using an HTI Biochem FC-120 automatic biochemical analyzer. Results: It was shown that the level of CPK activity in rat serum during chronic oral glyphosate administration for 120 days was elevated. With daily administration of the herbicide at a doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg the value of the parameter at the end of the experiment exceeded the control level by 57 ± 3% and 83 ± 4% respectively. Upon combined treatment with glyphosate and C60FAS at a dose of 1 mg/kg the level of CPK activity was decreased as compared to treatment with glyphosate only and by day 120 the protective effect of C60FAS amounted to 29 ± 2% regardless of the herbicide dose. Conclusions: The data obtained indicate the possibility of using changes in serum CPK as a marker of the efficacy of C60 fullerene therapy in mitigating the effects of herbicide poisoning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olga Abramchuk (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: