Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We state precisely the classical vorticity-direction regularity criteria of Constantin and Fefferman (Lipschitz direction) and of Beirão da Veiga and Berselli (½-Hölder direction) for the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations, record elementary lemmas about the direction field that we have kernel-checked in Lean 4, and explain how these criteria relate to the velocity projection Π_u used in the Frohmanian tether, in particular the projection gap where ω ∥ u. Status: The Constantin–Fefferman and Beirão da Veiga–Berselli criteria are classical results and are assumed as named hypotheses, not formalized. Only the elementary direction-field lemmas are proved in Lean 4 (0 sorry; axioms propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound only), in BenFrohman/frohmanian-tether-geometric at commit b740838. This note does not prove global regularity and makes no claim on the Clay Millennium problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Frohman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: