Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an anticancer drug that is metabolically activated to disrupt the functions of DNA and RNA. It remains a mystery how 5-FU in cells impacts the ribosomal RNA modification landscape at nucleotide resolution. Nanopore direct RNA sequencing was used to monitor rRNA modifications in E. coli and human cells exposed to 5-fluorouridine (5-FrU). Sequencing synthetic RNA standards identified that 5-FrU is nearly indistinguishable from U by ionic current and is miscalled as Ψ by the Ψ-aware base-calling model at a low but above-background rate (7.5% on average), resulting in Ψ losses being modestly underestimated by the sequencing method. In E. coli, 5-FrU slowed growth and decreased rRNA modification, most strongly at Ψ residues and also at m5U, Um, m4Cm, and m62A sites. At a subset of 23S Ψ sites, 5-FrU produced ionic current populations distinct from controls comprised of the parent nucleotide U or the substrate Ψ, found in the wild-type E. coli sample; these new signals suggest the cellular pseudouridine synthases attempted catalysis at this site but could not complete the isomerization reaction. In human HEK293T cells, 5-FrU decreased modification levels broadly across Ψ, Nm, m5C, and m6A in the 18S, 28S, and 5.8S rRNAs, with variation from position to position. Additionally, increased global base-calling errors were found, which are consistent with 5-FrU interference in RNA base calling and the drug-induced cellular RNA base damage. These data show that fluoropyrimidine exposure leaves site-specific scars in rRNA modification patterns that nanopore sequencing can detect directly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aaron M. Fleming (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: