Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background In conventionally fabricated dentures, debonding between the denture teeth and the denture base accounts for 22 to 30% of all denture repairs, with failures predominantly occurring in the anterior region. Various surface treatments and bonding protocols have been proposed to enhance adhesion between denture teeth and denture base; however, reliable bonding between three-dimensional (3D)-printed denture teeth and denture bases remains a challenge, and evidence regarding the influence of bonding strategies and surface treatment protocols is limited. Methods 3D-printed tooth-colored and denture base specimens ( n = 72) were fabricated and allocated into 3 bonding agent groups ( n = 24); in each group, the tooth-colored specimens were subdivided into two subgroups. In subgroup A, the undersurface of the tooth-colored specimens was air-abraded, while in subgroup B, it remained untreated. The bonding agent in the first group was 3D printing denture base liquid resin; in the second group, a universal adhesive; and in the third group, a resin cement. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles, after which shear bond strength was evaluated using a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Two-way analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of the bonding agents, surface treatment, and their interactions. Pairwise comparisons were performed utilizing pairwise t-tests with Bonferroni correction. Failure mode distributions were evaluated using the Fisher’s exact test. Results The null hypothesis was partially rejected. Two-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of bonding agent ( P < 0.001); neither surface treatment ( P = 0.881) nor the bonding agent-surface treatment interaction ( P = 0.146) reached statistical significance. The highest shear bond strength was reported in the liquid resin subgroups 9.04 ± 2.27 and 8.39 ± 2.12, and the lowest shear bond strength was in the resin cement subgroups 5.12 ± 1.75 and 4.27 ± 1.46. Airborne-particle abrasion had no significant effect within any individual bonding agent ( P = 0.438, P = 0.130, P = 0.315, respectively). Failure mode distribution differed significantly among the bonding protocols with and without air abrasion ( P < 0.001). Airborne-particle abrasion significantly altered failure mode distributions for liquid resin ( P < 0.001) and universal adhesive ( P = 0.001), but not for resin cement. Conclusions Under the tested conditions, liquid resin showed higher mean shear bond strength than universal adhesive and resin cement for bonding 3D-printed denture tooth-colored specimens and denture base, with a predominant cohesive failure mode. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion of the tooth-colored specimen-bonding surface did not significantly change shear bond strength within any individual group, but, resulted in a statistically significant change in failure mode for both the liquid resin and universal adhesive bonding protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farahat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: