Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We propose a nonparametric test of return asymmetry based on the realized quadratic covariation between a cumulative return path and its square using high-frequency data. Our null hypothesis is that the volatility path is independent of the Brownian motion driving returns. Under this null and a martingale condition, the infill limit of the statistic is conditionally Gaussian given the volatility path, with a conditional variance determined by integrated variance. Studentization by a feasible variance estimator yields an asymptotically standard normal statistic without specifying a parametric model for volatility. Simulations under Heston and Bates dynamics show near-nominal per-window size, quantify power gains from independent-window aggregation, and assess sensitivity to jump removal and volatility-dependent drift. An application to 165 U.S. stocks over 1998--2025 finds that rejections concentrate in negative asymmetry, consistent with the leverage effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: