Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Traditional arguments against the rationality of miracles typically depend upon a mechanistic, uniform view of physical laws, branding any divine intervention as an external violation of a closed system. Conversely, an advanced contemporary critique weaponizes structural complexity: the critic argues that if God cannot simply alter microscopic instances of physical reality because doing so would trigger the Chaotic Dispersion Defeater and disrupt natural macro-stability, then the occurrence of miracles becomes a metaphysical impossibility. This paper directly answers this thesis by applying Humphrey A. Beña's Argument from the Non-Uniformity of Causal Effects. By analyzing the universe as an intricately bound, non-linear structural causal lattice, we demonstrate that a miracle is fundamentally distinct from an external intervention. It does not cause a disruptive alteration or an invasive collapse in the interconnected web. Aligning this framework with classical Catholic metaphysics, we show that through the doctrine of potentia obedientialis (obediential potency), the open, non-uniform propensity architecture of creation fluidly and stably accommodates foundational inputs. Miracles are thus vindicated not as disruptive micro-alterations, but as the mathematically consistent, localized realizations of higher order within an inherently incomputable cosmic landscape.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Humphrey A. Beña (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: