Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Metal-organic covalent organic frameworks (MOCOFs) combine the advantages of covalent and metal-organic frameworks, but research remains sparse due to characterization difficulties, leaving unclear whether their formation is covalent- or coordination-directed. To date, only a few three-dimensional MOCOFs have been reported, while two-dimensional (2D) MOCOFs remain unexplored. Here, we strategically synthesize two single-crystal 2D MOCOFs with high porosity, denoted as PUMC-1 and PUMC-2. Leveraging three-dimensional electron diffraction, we are able to elucidate their formation process in detail. First, one-dimensional coordination polymers (1D CPs) are constructed from two sub-building units: tetrakis(4-aminophenyl) porphyrin and cobalt(II) trans-A₂B₂ porphyrin. Second, 1D CPs with covalent extension sites are used to construct two distinct 2D MOCOF conformations via covalent self-assembly under different conditions. Notably, the same 2D MOCOFs can also be directly obtained via one-pot synthesis with the same monomers, providing experimental evidence for a coordination-directed covalent assembly mechanism. This work not only expands the dimensionality of MOCOFs but also opens new avenues in reticular chemistry. Metal-organic covalent organic frameworks (MOCOFs) combine the advantages of covalent and metal-organic frameworks, but two-dimensional (2D) MOCOFs remain unexplored. Here, the authors synthesize two 2D MOCOFs with high porosity and elucidate their formation process in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: