Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RNA homology search plays a crucial role in RNA structure prediction, facing a trade-off between sensitivity and speed. Here we present RNAflash, a two-stage framework that combines RNA language model-based retrieval with structure-informed reranking and alignment. A retrieval bi-encoder RNAflash-R trained through contrastive learning first retrieves candidate RNA sequences from a large pre-encoded database. Then, its cross-encoder RNAflash-A reranks and aligns the retrieved RNA candidates via jointly trained prediction heads, using predicted secondary structures to refine nucleotide correspondence scores. Across held-out Rfam families, RNAflash retrieved RNA homologs more sensitively than sequence-based methods, and produced alignments comparable to those of structure-based methods. In large-scale searches of RNAcentral, RNAflash generated multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) with stronger coupling and covariation signals than sequence-based and Infernal pipelines, while performing search and MSA construction 3.7-fold faster than non-iterative Riboseek and over 100-fold faster than Infernal and RNAcmap. The lightweight variant RNAflash-L achieves sub-second average search times per query while producing higher-quality MSAs than nhmmer and non-iterative Riboseek. The results show that RNAflash makes sensitive RNA homology search and MSA construction more scalable, and provides an efficient source of MSAs for downstream RNA structure prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: