Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an increasingly knowledge-driven and multilingual world, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) offers a promising approach to developing learners’ language proficiency and subject knowledge simultaneously. This study explores secondary-level English teachers’ lived experiences of conceptualizing CLIL and interpreted the meanings they attributed to its relevance and use in English language classrooms. The study used a qualitative hermeneutic phenomenological design, grounded in the interpretive paradigm. Five experienced secondary-level English teachers were selected through criterion-based purposive sampling. Data were generated through in-depth interviews and informal interactions and were analyzed through coding, categorization, thematic clustering, and the interpretation of meaning units. The findings revealed six interrelated conceptualizations of CLIL: a dual-focused educational approach, an integrated learning pedagogy, an umbrella term, a holistic view of education, a contextual learning pedagogy, and a motivational tool. Participants linked CLIL to language proficiency, subject knowledge, transferable skills, engagement, confidence and real-life learning and identified technological, institutional and socio-cultural constraints. The study adds context-sensitive knowledge by positioning CLIL as an adaptable and holistic pedagogy linked to constructivist learning theory, post-method thinking, and Nepal’s complex multilingual educational realities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adhikari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: