Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study examines the associations of Green Accounting, Green Intellectual Capital, and Carbon Emission Disclosure with the firm value of IDX-listed energy companies during 2021–2024.Research Methodology: Annual and sustainability reports were analyzed using a Random Effect Model in EViews v13. Purposive sampling yielded 18 companies and 72 observations. Firm value is measured by PER, Green Accounting by an environmental-cost-to-profit ratio, and the other variables by disclosure indices.Results: Green Accounting has a positive significant coefficient (p = 0.0003). Green Intellectual Capital (p = 0.1823) and Carbon Emission Disclosure (p = 0.0902) are insignificant at 5%. The joint test is significant (p = 0.000685); weighted R-squared is 0.220581.Limitations: The four-year sample includes profitable companies. Investor perceptions, disclosure credibility, delayed benefits, and alternative error covariance structures are not directly evaluated.Conclusions: The measures have different valuation associations. Joint significance does not establish that every practice increases firm value or that their combination creates additional value.Contributions: The study provides Indonesian energy-sector evidence on the distinction between monetary environmental commitments and sustainability disclosure breadth in valuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harahap et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: