Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article offers a partial summary of the project titled Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Humanities and the Axiological Nature of Acts of Understanding. The axiological dimension of understanding is examined in relation to the identity of the humanities, which are becoming increasingly fragmented. I approach this issue through the distinction proposed by Stanisław Pietraszko, who argued for a distinction between the cognitive and non-cognitive humanities.This article presents examples of both types of humanities, highlighting not only the differences but also the similarities between them. I argue that it is still possible to speak of the humanities as a unified field and, in order to capture their unity in diversity, propose the terms “not-only-cognitive humanities” and “more-than-cognitive humanities.” I conclude by suggesting that Pietraszko’s axiological theory of culture, reinterpreted within the framework of cultural ontology, can provide a research perspective for studying the cultures that shape the practice of the humanities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcin Maria Bogusławski (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: