Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Robotic electronic skin (E-skin) links contact measurements to perception, manipulation and physical interaction. This critical narrative review compares sensing mechanisms, materials, acquisition and computation through published robot tasks. The synthesis identifies protocol-specific choices: holding requires a slip cue that guides a feasible correction; following requires the controlled pose error rather than localization accuracy alone; insertion comparisons depend on whether contact release and retry are allowed. Magnetic, capacitive, piezoresistive and multimodal cases extend the analysis beyond tactile imaging. Within-study comparisons are distinguished from demonstrations, device characterization and commercial specifications, with trial counts and uncertainty retained. Eligibility, source roles and revision-stage search records are documented; selection remains purposeful. The installed sensing-controller pair under a declared action allowance is the proposed unit of comparison. Complete-path energy, timing-fault response and performance after service remain insufficiently characterized in the inspected evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: