Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study develops a multi-objective fuzzy programming model (MOFPM) that integrates water-footprint accounting with fuzzy chance-constrained programming for multi-objective optimization. It sets differentiated constraints for green-blue-grey water-footprint components and adds fuzzy chance-constraints for crop-trade net benefit and virtual-water outflow loss, which simultaneously addresses uncertainties from both credibility parameters and decision-makers’ conflicting objective preferences. The model aims to maximize economic benefits and agricultural water productivity and minimize agricultural grey-water footprint under food-security restrictions. This optimization framework was applied to the Hanjiang River Basin, China. Under credibility levels γ ranging from 0.55 to 0.95, modelling outputs identify rice as the priority crop for expansion, while wheat and maize acreage should be largely reduced across most sub-basins. Relative to the baseline, crop economic benefits increase by 29–39%, water productivity improves by 10–11% (rising from 1.30kg/m3 to 1.43–1.45kg/m3), basin-scale blue water footprint declines by 10.4%, and grey water footprint falls by 11–15%. Spatially, green and blue water footprints rise in central-southern zones whereas grey water footprint decreases in the northwest; water-footprint losses induced by inter-regional crop trade are substantially reduced. Four decision-weight scenarios further verify that optimized schemes can achieve the system-wide economic, water-productivity and pollution-control targets. This study helps to adjust crop planting patterns and advance sustainable agricultural water management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: