Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for isolated compartment osteoarthritis; however, concerns persist regarding its long-term durability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate revision-free survivorship, risk factors for revision, and clinical outcomes in a large consecutive series of contemporary UKAs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive primary UKAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single tertiary academic center. Revision-free survivorship was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, and risk factors for revision were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Results: A total of 2,234 UKAs were included. Fixed-bearing implants were used in 78% of UKAs. Technology assistance was used in 59% of UKAs (fluoroscopy, 43%; robotic assistance, 15%; computer navigation, 1%). The mean patient age was 65 years, the mean body mass index was 31 kg/m 2 , and 49% of UKAs were performed in female patients. Patient race was White in 97% of UKAs, and patient ethnicity was not Hispanic or Latino in 94%. Revision-free survivorship was 92% at 10 years and 85% at 15 years. Overall, 118 UKAs were revised, most commonly through conversion to total knee arthroplasty (97%). The most frequent indications for revision were progression of osteoarthritis in an adjacent compartment (41%), aseptic loosening (23%), unexplained pain (9%), and hardware failure (9%). Factors associated with a lower risk of revision in the univariable analysis included technology assistance (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; p < 0.01) and high surgeon volume (HR, 0.5; p < 0.01). Mobile-bearing design (HR, 1.9; p < 0.01) was associated with an increased risk of revision in the univariable analysis. The mean KSS improved from 47 preoperatively to 75 at 5 years postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this large consecutive series, UKA demonstrated excellent long-term survivorship, with an approximately 1% annual risk of revision through 15 years. Technology assistance, a fixed-bearing implant design, and high surgeon volume were each associated with a lower risk of revision, underscoring the importance of operative technique and implant selection in achieving durable outcomes. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsukamoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: