Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, we evaluate a simple inference-time scaling approach based on turn-level best-of-N sampling () for large language model (LLM) agents on complex, long-horizon tasks. We instantiate this using a generator-selector framework with two LLMs; at each turn, a generator model generates N candidate actions and a selector model selects one of them, which is then executed in the environment. This paper is closely related to the work of {zainullina2025guided} who used critic models for guided search at inference time. Different from their work, we evaluate if off-the-shelf, open-weight LLMs can be effective at comparing different candidate actions directly. Experiments on long-horizon terminal tasks show that can lead to significant performance improvements, both in terms of accuracy (5--10%) and consistency across repeated attempts. Analysis of agent trajectories reveal a shift in agent behaviour towards desirable patterns such as reduction in number of attempts to solve the task, improved task instruction following, debugging and testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhandari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: