Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is a balance between procedural success and patient acceptability in outpatient hysteroscopy. Reporting either outcome alone inadequately reflects how well the procedure was conducted. A new metric is proposed: the "Clark ratio", defined as patient acceptability divided by procedural failure, to capture this trade-off. Higher ratios indicate better performance. The limitations of data from randomised controlled trials and need for real-world evidence and standardised outcome measures to validate feasibility and patient experience is discussed. The Clark ratio is a new concept and could potentially be adopted, if found to be valid and useful, as a simple, easily interpretable, pragmatic benchmark for quality assurance and outcome in research for outpatient hysteroscopic procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Justin Clark (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: