Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automatic modulation classification (AMC) is a crucial task in modern communication systems, enabling the identification of modulation schemes in received signals. This paper presents a proposed model to achieve AMC more accurately by using hybrid techniques, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) with spectrograms as input features. The system is evaluated under the influence of Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) with Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNR) set at -5, 5, and 10 dB. The model was trained using the Adam optimizer with a fixed learning rate of 0.00001, mini-batch size of 32, and four epochs. The reported overall accuracies are 75.00%, 87.73%, and 99.68% at − 5, 5, and 10 dB, respectively. CPFSK accuracy is 0% at − 5 and 5 dB and 100% at 10 dB. These results demonstrate strong performance on the evaluated MATLAB/AWGN test configuration, but they do not establish robustness under multipath fading, Doppler, timing offsets, non-Gaussian noise, alternative train/test splits, alternative optimizers or learning-rate schedules, or alternative time–frequency representations. In addition, convergence beyond four epochs, CNN-only/LSTM-only ablations, STFT sensitivity, model parameter count, and inference latency were not experimentally evaluated. Therefore, the reported results should be interpreted as dataset- and channel-specific evidence rather than as a controlled claim of superiority over other AMC approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obead et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: