Key result
Mitral valve repair shows similar 10-year reoperation rates compared to replacement in Marfan syndrome.
Why the study?
Does mitral valve repair improve long-term freedom from reoperation, recurrent mitral regurgitation, and survival compared with mitral valve replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome and mitral regurgitation?
Cohort (n=33)
No
Does mitral valve repair improve long-term freedom from reoperation, recurrent mitral regurgitation, and survival compared with mitral valve replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome and mitral regurgitation?
Both mitral valve repair and replacement achieve acceptable 10-year outcomes in patients with Marfan syndrome, though failure modes differ distinctly with clinically stable recurrent MR occurring after repair versus paravalvular leak requiring reoperation after replacement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both strategies offer durable results in this population; extends evidence to Marfan syndrome but leaves open randomized comparisons.
Background: Because data on the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for mitral valve (MV) disease in patients with Marfan syndrome remain limited, we compared the long-term outcomes after MV repair or replacement. Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated 33 patients with Marfan syndrome who underwent mitral regurgitation (MR) surgery between November 1984 and July 2023. Patients were categorized into MV repair (n=19) and MV replacement (n=14) groups. Outcomes included survival, recurrent MR (≥grade 3), reoperation, and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. No in-hospital deaths occurred in either group. Overall survival at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, was 100%, 100%, and 70% after repair, and 100%, 100%, and 91.7%after replacement (P=0.48). Freedom from recurrent MR (≥grade 3) at 10 years was 90.9% after repair, and 82.5% after replacement (P=0.30). Freedom from mitral reoperation at 10 years was 94.1% after repair, and 91.7% after replacement (P=0.34). All reoperations in the replacement group were performed for paravalvular leak, whereas recurrent MR subsequent to repair was infrequent and clinically stable. Conclusions: Acceptable outcomes were observed after both MV repair and MV replacement in patients with Marfan syndrome. The modes of failure differed between procedures: recurrent MR occurred after repair, whereas paravalvular leak required reoperation after replacement. These descriptive observations may help inform surgical decision-making regarding potential procedure-specific failure patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Machii et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Marfan syndrome with mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve surgery (n=33). Mitral valve repair (annuloplasty in 100%, ring implantation in 84.2%, chordal replacement in 52.6%) vs. Mitral valve replacement (mechanical valve in 92.9%, bioprosthetic valve in 7.1%) was evaluated on Freedom from mitral reoperation at 10 years (p=0.34). Mitral valve repair and replacement showed similar 10-year freedom from mitral reoperation (94.1% vs 91.7%, P=0.34) in Marfan syndrome patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: