Why the study?
Does mitral valve repair provide safe and durable outcomes in symptomatic patients with Marfan syndrome?
Does mitral valve repair provide safe and durable outcomes in symptomatic patients with Marfan syndrome?
Mitral valve repair in symptomatic patients with Marfan syndrome is associated with excellent mid-term survival and durable valve function, demonstrating feasibility even with minimally invasive approaches.
Supports mitral repair feasibility in Marfan syndrome; extends observational data but leaves open randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve (MV) regurgitation is a common manifestation in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and is age dependent. Valve pathology shares some features with myxomatous MV disease. Surgical treatment is still being debated and not well characterized in patients with MFS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the results of mitral valve repair (MVR) of symptomatic patients with MFS who underwent surgery between January 2004 and April 2011. MFS was diagnosed following the Ghent criteria. MVR was performed in 12 patients. Three patients underwent minimally invasive MVR despite severe thorax deformities. Mean follow-up was 60.1 months (95% CI: 48-72) and was complete. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 0%. One patient died because of arrhythmia 66 months after MVR. Transthoracic echocardiography at last visit showed mild mitral regurgitation in one patient (8.3%) and no mitral regurgitation in the remaining patients (91.7%). CONCLUSION: MVR was associated with excellent survival and a low rate of complications. Transthoracic echocardiography showed good results of the repaired valves even years later. Minimally invasive repairs are feasible even in deformed thoraces, lowering the risk for future aortic surgery. Because of excellent mid-term to long-term results, MVR may also be justified in asymptomatic Marfan patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Detter et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: