Key result
Coronary revascularisation cuts CV events by ~62 percentage points vs medical therapy in diabetic kidney transplant candidates.
Why the study?
Insulin-dependent diabetic renal transplant candidates with substantial coronary artery disease have a 2-year survival of less than 50%, yet their management is controversial because most lack angina symptoms. It was unknown whether coronary revascularisation decreases cardiac events in this population.
Does coronary artery revascularisation reduce the combined incidence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with chronic renal failure and asymptomatic or atypical coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=26)
randomly assigned
Does coronary artery revascularisation reduce the combined incidence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with chronic renal failure and asymptomatic or atypical coronary artery disease?
Coronary revascularisation significantly reduces cardiac morbidity and mortality compared to medical therapy in asymptomatic insulin-dependent diabetic patients with chronic renal failure awaiting renal transplantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports revascularisation in diabetic renal transplant candidates with asymptomatic CAD; extends sparse RCT evidence in this high-risk group.
Insulin-dependent diabetic patients found to have substantial coronary artery disease at the time of assessment for renal transplantation have 2-year survival of less than 50%. Because most of these patients have no angina symptoms their management is controversial. We tried to find out whether coronary artery revascularisation in such patients might decrease the combined incidence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. 151 consecutive insulin-dependent diabetic candidates for renal transplantation underwent coronary angiography. 31 had stenoses greater than 75% in one or more coronary arteries, atypical chest pain or no chest pain, and a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 0.35. Of these, 26 agreed to be randomly assigned medical treatment (a calcium-channel-blocking drug plus aspirin) or revascularisation (angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery). 10 of 13 medically managed and 2 of 13 revascularised patients had a cardiovascular endpoint within a median of 8.4 months of coronary angiography (p < 0.01). 4 medically managed patients died of myocardial infarction during follow-up. Thus, revascularisation decreased the frequency of cardiac events in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with chronic renal failure and symptomless coronary artery stenoses. These findings suggest that diabetic renal transplant candidates should be screened for silent coronary artery disease, because revascularisation may decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manske et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Insulin-dependent diabetes with chronic renal failure and coronary artery disease (n=26). Coronary artery revascularisation (angioplasty or coronary bypass surgery) vs. Medical treatment (a calcium-channel-blocking drug plus aspirin) was evaluated on Combined incidence of unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death (p=< 0.01). Coronary revascularisation reduced cardiovascular events compared to medical therapy in diabetic renal transplant candidates (15.4% vs 76.9%; p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: