Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: to assess the influence of multiple composite resin types, application methods, and aging on the fracture resistance of premolars with Mesio-occlusal-distal (MOD) cavities.Materials and methods: Forty sound upper premolars with standardized MOD cavities, were randomly distributed into two main groups (n=20) according to the type of resin composite. Then, each group of them was distributed into two subgroups (n=10) according to the application methods. Each subgroup was further distributed into two divisions (n=5) according to the effect of aging.G-premio adhesive system was applied in accordance with the guidelines provided by the supplier. Restorations were grouped: Group 1 (Incremental G-aenial posterior), Group 2 (Bulk-fill EverX posterior), Group 3 (Incremental G-aenial Injectable), and Group 4 (Bulk-fill EverX flow).Half the number of each of the 4 groups (n=20) was randomly chosen and underwent 5000 cycles of thermocycling (between 5 and 55 °C). The specimens were affixed to a 5 kN load cell on an Instron 3345 computer-controlled material testing apparatus.Results: Group 4 gave the greatest fracture resistance value in the aged groups and Group 2 gave the greatest fracture resistance value in the non-aged groups. While Group 1 gave the least value of fracture resistance in the aged groups.Conclusions: The bulk-fill short fiber reinforced composites, used as restoration of premolars with MOD cavities, could have a significant reinforcing effect on the treated teeth more than the incremental conventional technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertie et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: