Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Uncertainty in non-linear mixed effect models is often assessed using the Fisher information matrix to derive the standard errors of estimation. The bootstrap is an alternative to the asymptotic method, with different approaches to handle the different levels of individual and population variabilities.We propose here a non-parametric bootstrap, cNP, resampling from the conditional distribution of the individual parameters, preserving the structure of the original data. cNP was implemented in the saemix package for R along with the case, parametric (Par), and non-parametric (NP) residual bootstraps. Coverage rates were compared in a simulation study using sigmoid Emax models, with rich, sparse and unbalanced designs, and 3 levels of residual variability.The asymptotic method tended to produce lower than theoretical coverages for the variance terms. Bootstraps provided more adequate coverage, but none of the approaches maintained coverage when the residual error increased. Overall, the new cNP and the Case provided better coverage than the classical NP.The new conditional non-parametric bootstrap could be used when it is important to preserve the structure of the original dataset, such as the number of observations or the repartition of covariates as it does not require stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaisaridi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: