Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background and Objective: Non-melanoma skin cancer frequently affects the ear, where reconstruction is challenged by limited local tissue availability.Skin grafting is a simple and reliable option, but the choice between full-thickness (FTSG) and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) varies in clinical practice.This study aimed to compare outcomes following auricular reconstruction using these two techniques.Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 141 patients who underwent auricular reconstruction after excision of non-melanoma skin cancer between January 2022 and December 2024.Patients received either a STSG or a FTSG.Graft take, surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared between the two graft types.Results: STSG showed higher graft take than FTSG (90.0%vs 78.9%; mean difference 11.0%, 95% CI 0.6-21.5;P=.04).Complication rates did not differ significantly between groups.Conclusion: STSG provided comparable and possibly higher graft take, while complication rates were comparable between techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiilerich et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: