Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study continues the series of investigations devoted to identifying the Old Iranian lexical substratum in Old Chinese. The focus is on fourteen sinographs associated with the semantic fields of light, fire, heat, and burning: 兆 (zhào), 昭 (zhāo), 焞 (tūn), 炤 (zhào/zhāo), 燾 (dào/tāo), 暾 (tūn), 燉 (dùn), 煓 (tuān), 照 (zhào), 烔 (tóng), 曈 (tóng), 炵 (tōng), 晪 (tiǎn), 晀 (tiǎo). All are attested in different chronological layers—from Shang oracle-bone inscriptions to the dictionaries of the Liang and Yuan eras. Traditional Chinese lexicography explains each sinograph separately but does not answer the question of why graphs belonging to different semantic spheres—light (key 日), fire (key 火), and burning—use close phonetic components converging on a single sound contour according to the reconstructions of different scholarly schools. The present work continues Issue A9 [51], devoted to metallurgy terms, and fills in its material: the cluster of fire, burning, and light is set apart into an independent study. The material comprises Chinese primary sources and traditional lexicography, paleographic and chronological data. The method is verificational analysis based on the primacy of semantics and the concept of phonetic approximation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taymuraz Kokoyti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: